#17058: Add abelian_vectors and abelian_complexity method to finite words
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: slabbe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vdelecroix/17058 | a749bc38dc4ed94942e22e0af11686609c0db669
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:15 slabbe]:
> > Do you mind if we remove the `.. NOTE:`?
>
> Okay.
Cool!
> > For the `INPUT` section. It is needed only if the arguments are not
described in the documentation or if they are quite subtle. And whatever
is inside `self` can not appear there.
>
> I thought the INPUT block was always necessary...
None of the section of the docstring is mandatory except `EXAMPLES` or
`TESTS`. In particular a function whose header is `Return the number of
factors of length n` does not need an `INPUT` nor an `OUTPUT` section. The
docstring are only used for documentation (and doctesting): the simplest
the best!
I am having a last look.
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17058#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
