#16275: Hom: introduce a check argument to simplify the unpickling detection 
logic
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  closed
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:  fixed
       Keywords:  homset, pickling   |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nicolas M.         |    Reviewers:  Simon King, Nicolas
  Thiéry, Simon King                 |  M. Thiéry
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  e1e916cde347deac1df9079f7ec856184e3862bf|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:46 jdemeyer]:
 > Could you please justify your use of `except BaseException` instead of
 `except Exception`. This looks like a bug to me, but I might be missing
 something.

 I have no specific insight there: the previous code was using
 BaseException at this point (or rather the analogue thereof) and I just
 carried it over. Indeed ``Exception`` seems to make more sense; I might be
 missing something too though.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16275#comment:47>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to