#6162: [with patch, positive review] plot_histogram improvments
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: wdj | Owner: was
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.1
Component: graphics | Keywords: plot histogram
Reviewer: cswiercz | Author: Nick Alexander
Merged: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by cswiercz):
Using your example, I'm just curious is there's any difference between the
following two plots: (aside from the default red indexing below each bar
in the plot)
{{{
sage: J = [ZZ(n) for n in range(10)]
sage: A = [RR(gauss(0,1)) for n in range(10)]
sage: s = IndexedSequence(A,J)
sage: s.plot_histogram()
sage: bar_chart(s.list())
}}}
The only difference I can see is bar placement. (The indexing set easily
allows you to place the bars in {{{IndexedSequence().plot_histogram()}}}
wherever you like.) I'm sure that there's a lot of application for kind of
plot with an indexed set.
I tested the functionality of your code and, from my observations, it
works great! Therefore, I give it a positive review. I just wanted a
little bit of clarification on what kind of information the
{{{plot_histogram()}}} method was actually presenting.
Sorry if my questions caused too much of a problem.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6162#comment:12>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
