#17125: More Sym and NSym functionality
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: symmetric | Merged in:
functions, noncommutative | Reviewers:
symmetric functions, | Work issues:
Authors: Darij Grinberg | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | ba5904701ada855a2fae8315ac8fda137e355ad3
Branch: u/darij/moresym | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Replying to [comment:4 darij]:
> Why an extra syntax for the one-row partitions? Just because they're
defined first in Gessel-Reutenauer (they are also characters of the free
Lie algebra as S_n-representations, I believe).
I somewhat feel that this can muddy things because you really want
partitions. Although if you do want the extra semantic (I don't have a
strong opinion), then I think you should just check `if lam in ZZ:`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17125#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
