#16998: Documentation conflict on is_graded()
---------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------
Description changed by jmantysalo:
Old description:
> Documentation for `is_graded()` on `posets.py` says "Note that every
> graded poset is ranked, but the converse is not true.", whereas
> `hasse_diagram.py` says "A poset is *graded* if it admits a rank
> function."
>
> Somebody knowing area should check this.
New description:
Documentation for `is_graded()` on `posets.py` says "Note that every
graded poset is ranked, but the converse is not true.", whereas
`hasse_diagram.py` says "A poset is *graded* if it admits a rank
function."
Somebody knowing area should check this.
Somehow relating to this: note in `is_graded` on `posets.py` should be
removed, see #13223.
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16998#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
