#15792: A previously fixed regression has reappeared
-------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: performance | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:20 nbruin]:
> The large contribution from `dynamic_class_internal` in [comment:15]
doesn't seem to be there in 6.4beta5 anymore. In fact, the relevant line
now is:
> {{{
> 7 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000
dynamic_class.py:324(dynamic_class_internal)
> }}}
> so I expect that this unfortunate artifact was fixed by #15801. Looking
at the present profile, as well as the runsnake boxchart, I don't see
anything jumping out as problematic. Close?
What is runsnake boxchart?
If you think that the regression has disappeared, I wouldn't mind to get
this ticket closed (with you as reviewer, since you did tests).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15792#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
