#17096: Implement categories for filtered algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  filtered algebras  |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/categoires/filtered_algebras-17096|  
ad184efacc9ceabfb1179ccd4d677786f4713b01
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:1 tscrim]:
 > - Every graded algebra is a filtered algebra under the "natural"
 filtration of summing over (weakly) smaller degrees (assuming total
 ordering on the grading group). This is implicit in the category
 structure; nothing specific is implemented.

 Of course, depending on the context, the converse convention can also
 sense; but maybe that's ok because eventually we will have both
 filtered and descendingFiltered (or something similar) categories.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filtration_%28mathematics%29

 > - Every `graded_*` category has `filtered_*` as an immediate super
 category. In particular, this is needed for `GradedAlgebrasWithBasis` not
 picking up `FilteredAlgebrasWithBasis` in its super categories otherwise.

 This seems like the same situation as for quotients
 w.r.t. subquotients. So the same mechanism should do the job (see
 `sage.categories.quotients.Quotients.default_super_categories`). Please
 confirm!

 > - Homogeneous elements for filtered algebras are elements in F,,i,, not
 in F,,i-1,,. I don't know if this is a standard definition, but it allowed
 extensions of methods from graded to filtered.

 I see the point. The inconvenient is of course that this makes the set
 of homogeneous elements for a given i not be a vector space. What do
 you do with 0 btw?

 Cheers,
                                Nicolas

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17096#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to