#15820: Implement sequences of bounded integers
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing          |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  algebra            |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  sequence bounded   |    Merged in:
  integer                            |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Simon King         |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  b182ba27bdaeb0f066daf1b575db3588b3195f89
  u/SimonKing/ticket/15820           |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:161 jdemeyer]:
 > Just randomly looking through this patch...
 >
 > I don't like to put this in `src/sage/misc`. There is already too much
 stuff there. I think we need an additional top-level directory for basic
 data structures like this (bitset also should be in there). What do you
 think of `src/sage/data_structures`?

 I think this question has been discussed on another ticket that I
 authored. My impression from the discussion was that "structural" stuff
 should either go to `sage/structure` or `sage/misc`. It should be the
 former, if it is about structures that only make sense in Sage (Parents,
 elements, ...), whereas `sage/misc` is for structure that would also make
 sense without Sage. I thought that bounded integer sequences belong to the
 latter, and I would also think that `TripleDict` and `MonoDict` should
 better be in `sage/misc` (the only reason for them being in
 `sage/structure` is the fact that they were introduced for coercion, which
 is Sage specific).

 So, I think `sage/misc` is a good place. But I wouldn't mind to introduce
 a third structural module, `sage/data_structures`. On a different ticket?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15820#comment:164>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to