#15673: major improvements to lazy power series
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mhansen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: LazyPowerSeries,, | Merged in:
days57 | Reviewers: Ralf Stephan,
Authors: Mike Hansen | Matthieu Dien
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/15673 | 8e004ea424678354b242afd43f7bdbe17501e1f0
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by mantepse):
Is there any intention to pursue #16137? I'm not sure, but it seems to me
that my comments 11 and 13 above were not taken into account so far (in
fact, 13 was not answered at all), and the design decisions taken here
seem to contradict the ideas of #16137. This is partially about
terminology: from a user's perspective, I wouldn't expect a stream to
carry any semantics except that it is a possibly infinite sequence of
things. In particular, it should work also for things other than numbers
and polynomials. However, then things like {{{IntegralStream}}} doesn't
make sense, this is confusing formal power series with streams.
That said, I tried to read the code, and found that I'm completely lost.
I have no way to adapt it as to provide an alternative implementation.
Thus, in case you think my concerns are of minor importance, please go
ahead!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15673#comment:35>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
