#17130: Fix coercion bugs in symbolic functions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/17130 | b6e1ed44a663f7410fddb2e3e4c134aa3a0ce8cf
Dependencies: #17131, #17133 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* cc: burcin (added)
Comment:
Wow, that first commit is a nice patch bomb. I hesitate to make so much
change to how symbolic functions are evaluated without taking a pretty
close look, my apologies for not trying to do that immediately. Also, I
think there was an actual reason for calling it `inexact` and not
`numerical`, though I don't remember offhand.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17130#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
