#16986: Enhance rational_preimages and all_rational_preimages to work over
Number
Fields
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdefaria | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
geometry | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Ben Hutz
Authors: Joao de Faria | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 928941e6a3df966c89ae97c7bf0250bd049e264c
u/jdefaria/ticket/16986 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by bhutz):
opps, my mistake, that example is fixed I just didn't get the latest
commits on my last pull. There are still three minor issues:
- line 2552 trailing white space
- doc string references endomorphism of projective space, but since you're
allowing subschemes, you just need 'an endomorphism'.
- coordinates is spelled wrong line 2611
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16986#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
