#17237: Consistent complex arguments for log integral
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  kcrisman   |            Owner:
       Type:  defect     |           Status:  new
   Priority:  major      |        Milestone:  sage-6.4
  Component:  basic      |         Keywords:
  arithmetic             |          Authors:
  Merged in:             |  Report Upstream:  Reported upstream. Developers
  Reviewers:             |  acknowledge bug.
Work issues:             |           Branch:
     Commit:             |     Dependencies:
   Stopgaps:             |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 At [http://ask.sagemath.org/question/24630/log_integral-gives-wrong-
 values-for-complex-arguments/ this ask.sagemath question] it comes to our
 attention that `Li(x)` and `Ei(log(x))` don't always agree, though
 apparently `Ei(log(x))` currently gives what one wants on the critical
 strip for the Riemann zeta function.  mpmath apparently doesn't really
 choose "smart" branch cuts for `Ei` internally, or maybe it's the log
 integral that doesn't ... anyway, we need consistency here more than
 anything else, though having it agree with the usual stuff on the critical
 line would be nice.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17237>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to