#17248: Rewriting the method cardinality in the SetPartitions_setparts
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  g.chatel           |        Owner:  gchatel
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  cardinality, set   |    Merged in:
  partitions                         |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Grégory Châtel     |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  public/combinat    |  627efa1fd7d910fb031f17c74da729557ceec588
  /set-partition-cardinality-17248   |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):

 * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:6 g.chatel]:
 > Thanks a lot for your comments, It helps me a lot to learn how Sage
 works.
 >
 > Do I need to modify the status of this ticket back to "needs review" ?

 Yes. I did it. Basically the workflow is

  - author does modif
  - author puts in needs review
  - reviewer complains (and possibly provides commit) and set to needs
 work/needs info

 and you repeat until agreement.

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17248#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to