#6258: [with patch, needs review] Improve accuracy of graph eigenvalues
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  rbeezer       |       Owner:  rbeezer 
     Type:  defect        |      Status:  new     
 Priority:  critical      |   Milestone:  sage-4.1
Component:  graph theory  |    Keywords:          
 Reviewer:                |      Author:          
   Merged:                |  
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by rbeezer):

  * priority:  minor => critical


Comment:

 The patch generally improves graph eigenvalues by not altering the
 adjacency matrix and therefore allowing new routines to take advantage of
 the adjacency matrix being a matrix of integers.  It also corrects a
 serious bug for eigenvalues of digraphs.  More specifically

 1.  The adjacency matrix is no longer converted to a matrix of reals or
 complexes.

 2.  Eigenspaces are now more abstract (but are exact).  More numerical
 results come from the new {{{eigenvectors()}}} method.

 3.  Any complex part of an eigenvalue was previously being stripped, as if
 a graph could never be a digraph.  This has been corrected and a simple
 doctest added.

 4.  While in the neighborhood, the {{{characteristic_polynomial()}}} got
 some cosmetic changes in its docstring.

 5.  Long-term, the {{{spectrum()}}} command should return some sort of
 object, like a {{{Factorization}}} object, as discussed on sage-devel.
 Then the current {{{spectrum()}}} could be renamed as {{{eigenvalues()}}}.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6258#comment:2>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to