#2452: [with patch, needs work] Heaviside step function, Dirac delta needed
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: gfurnish | Owner: gfurnish
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.1
Component: symbolics | Keywords:
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by gmhossain):
Replying to [comment:15 burcin]:
> Sorry for doing this in such small pieces, but I have one more
suggestion.
>
> You can change the calls to the `_is_real()` function by `x in RR` where
you import `RR` from `sage.rings.real_mpfr`.
> The semantics of the `__contains__()` method in Sage is similar to your
`_is_real()`, though it also checks that `approx_x == x` in your code.
Hi Burcin. I tried your suggestion. I am not sure whats going wrong but it
slows down massively. Could
you please check this out?
'''With: `_is_real(x)`'''
{{{
sage: timeit( 'dirac_delta(1 + I*exp(-10000))')
125 loops, best of 3: 6.47 ms per loop
sage: timeit( 'dirac_delta(1 + I*exp(-10000000000000000))')
125 loops, best of 3: 6.23 ms per loop
}}}
'''with: `x in RR`'''
{{{
sage: timeit( 'dirac_delta(1 + I*exp(-10000))')
125 loops, best of 3: 6.56 ms per loop
sage: timeit( 'dirac_delta(1 + I*exp(-10000000000000000))')
5 loops, best of 3: 154 ms per loop
}}}
Thanks,
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2452#comment:16>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---