#17314: Poset: interval vs. closed_interval
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
jmantysalo | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: minor | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | cbb3a46c9eb99412ff9bebca8c7b24d7bc61c13a
Frédéric Chapoton | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/chapoton/17314 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
AFAIK, there's no such class in Sage, but I think my (possibly somewhat
contrived) example in sage-devel of private code is a possibility. Also
it's net gain of some 16 lines and a function call, so IMO there's no gain
from this change. If you're at the point where you need to optimize out a
function call, you're reading the source code and would just make the swap
`closed_interval` -> `interval`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17314#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
