#17130: Fix coercion bugs in symbolic functions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/17130 | b6e1ed44a663f7410fddb2e3e4c134aa3a0ce8cf
Dependencies: #17131, #17133 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:36 kcrisman]:
> Something else to note (very minor) is that if the top of
http://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/symbolics/functions needed some slight
updating in order to still be useful, it would be good to do that at the
time this was resolved.
I don't think anything needs updating. But it would be good though to
think more generally about what the API should be for symbolic functions.
I consider this ticket as a first step in the right direction.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17130#comment:37>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
