#17205: update ore_algebra package
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: zieglerk | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: packages: | Resolution:
optional | Merged in:
Keywords: ImportError | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman,
Authors: Manuel Kauers | John Palmieri, Konstantin Ziegler
Report Upstream: Fixed upstream, | Work issues:
in a later stable release. | Commit:
Branch: | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
Okay, I think we can merge this. A test suite of some sort should be
possible, and I'm glad you're going to work on it for a future release.
> the following inconsistency:
{{{
sage: x, y = ZZ['x','y'].gens()
sage: GF(1091)['x','y'].random_element().degree(x) ### works
sage: GF(3037000453)['x','y'].random_element().degree(x) ### fails
}}}
This is certainly inconsistent, but I'm not sure whether both should work
or both should fail. Should x automatically be coerced to an element of
the polynomial ring over GF(p)? I've posted a question on sage-devel, and
eventually we should open a ticket about it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17205#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
