#12257: 1.0*pi should *not* be pi
----------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  was       |        Owner:  burcin
           Type:  defect    |       Status:  new
       Priority:  minor     |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  calculus  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  pynac     |    Merged in:
        Authors:            |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A       |  Work issues:
         Branch:            |       Commit:
   Dependencies:            |     Stopgaps:
----------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 Here is another idea.  In
 [http://www.ginac.de/reference/mul_8cpp_source.html#l00442 the Ginac
 source], we have
 {{{
 00464     } else if (seq_size==1 && overall_coeff.is_equal(_ex1)) {
 00465         // *(x;1) -> x
 00466         return recombine_pair_to_ex(*(seq.begin()));
 }}}
 and that could be somehow changed.  And the other issue is
 [http://www.ginac.de/reference/inifcns__trans_8cpp_source.html#l00303
 here]
 {{{
 00319         if (z.is_equal(*_num0_p))  // sin(0)       -> 0
 00320             return _ex0;
 }}}
 so again if there were a way to have Pynac return "the right" zero...  I
 think this is kind of philosophy difference is at the root of several
 little coercion buglets.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12257#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to