#16466: Add gambit as an optional package
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jcampbell | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: packages: | Resolution:
optional | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Thierry Monteil,
Authors: James Campbell, | Karl-Dieter Crisman, Travis
Vince Knight | Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vinceknight/gambit | 1005e9d1079dbe7567b2870c8147fa6b9bfd1f6c
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* reviewer: Thierry Monteil, Karl-Dieter Crisman => Thierry Monteil, Karl-
Dieter Crisman, Travis Scrimshaw
Comment:
I think that if you just added a file `game_theory/gambit.py` that
explained how to use it independently of Sage, that would be fine.
In fact, you could have untested examples that show it in the Ipython
setting - notebook or command line - since presumably it will work there.
In fact, I just tried it, and it does! So if someone wanted to "just use"
Gambit they could do it that way.
But if that is a lot of work, you can definitely think of that as a
followup ticket, though one that would be very useful to get in before the
new year (at which point I will have much less time to review such
things).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16466#comment:42>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
