#17410: unambiguously doctest longest_path()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  charpent           |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  trivial            |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
      Component:  graph theory       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Emmanuel           |    Reviewers:  Vincent Delecroix
  Charpentier                        |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  fcc15b40f515eef263f8afdc6c4d848fa28fead0
  u/charpent/unambiguously_doctest_longest_path__|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Emmanuel Charpentier', 'oldvalue': u'Emmanuel 
Charpentier, Vincent Delecroix'}):

 * reviewer:   => Vincent Delecroix
 * author:  Emmanuel Charpentier, Vincent Delecroix => Emmanuel Charpentier


Comment:

 Hi Emmanuel,

 I changed my status from author to reviewer. That's more reasonable.

 why `bool(something)` instead of `something` like in
 {{{
 sage: p = G.longest_path()
 sage: set(p.edges(labels=False)) == {(0,3), (2,0), (3,4)}
 True
 }}}
 (and by the way, the option `labels=False` of the method `.edges` is
 really cool)

 Sorry for being so picky.

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17410#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to