#17130: Fix coercion bugs in symbolic functions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer           |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  symbolics          |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer     |    Reviewers:  Ralf Stephan
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jdemeyer/ticket/17130            |  abab222e67040518acee766f747c161a7445bc0a
   Dependencies:  #17131, #17133     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by rws):

 There may be a followup in a later ticket to deal with an inconsistency,
 if you agree that the following discrepancy between functions with one and
 two parameters needs addressing:
 {{{
 sage: i = ComplexField(30).0
 sage: gamma(i)
 -0.15494983 - 0.49801567*I
 sage: gamma(1.0*I)
 -0.154949828301811 - 0.498015668118356*I
 sage: jacobi_am(2., 2)
 0.549820282407325
 sage: jacobi_am(2., i)
 jacobi_am(2.00000000000000, 1.0000000*I)
 sage: jacobi_am(2., 1.0*I)
 jacobi_am(2.00000000000000, 1.00000000000000*I)
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17130#comment:55>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to