#16256: Reorganize the documentation indexes into src/sage/combinat
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: combinatorics, | Merged in:
thematic index, quickref | Reviewers: Anne Schilling
Authors: Nicolas M. | Work issues:
ThiƩry, Jean-Pierre Flori | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | f5aa239b4946392411d97f4269ef5e646e215bfc
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/nthiery/ticket/16256 |
Dependencies: #16058, #17189 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> Hi Nathann, I found the pre-implemented posets under
Oh I see. I read "Posets" and I was thinking of
{{{
sage: Posets(4)
Posets containing 4 vertices
}}}
I did not know that "Posets" was equal to 'posets'.
But really I do not understand why you point toward the `Poset` function
instead of the posets file, which shortcuts the module-level
documentation. Users will miss the whole index of functions, won't they ?
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/posets/posets.html
Sorry I can't experiment with your branch, the University where I am has
some stupid proxy rules and I cannot download a git branch.
Also, you did not mention Hasse Diagrams.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16256#comment:106>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.