#17424: Index of poset constructors
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.5
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
documentation | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | aef6f774604504222290e65216d013b2f0eae954
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/17424 |
Dependencies: |
#16526 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> It's nice looking indeed. What about using "catalog" rather than
"index"?
Oh. Well, because I named it "index" everywhere else. Index of functions,
stuff like that. Change it if you like, but here I used "index" as in "an
exhaustive list of things".
> In the long run, it's one more thing that we need to maintain by hand.
We should investigate ways to automatize parts of it.
Yes. But this is really something which should be done on the Sphinx side.
We can do something ourselves (there are some hacks in the listing of
`graph_generators`) but it should really be Sphinx code.
Anyway, in the meantime that should not stop us from building an index for
all 'important' classes. These things are useful.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17424#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
