#15706: Graph built from their edges are simple by default
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  graph theory       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen      |    Reviewers:  Dima Pasechnik
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/ticket/15706                |  7c69f250922b0373de62e16b16baaab7f8b2fd32
   Dependencies:  #15704             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > Okay, I'll let Dima take the fall if users complain ;-)  Seriously, I
 hope this leads to less confusion in the long-run for people who like both
 multigraphs and simple ones; I just didn't want to make that UI decision.

 Well. Regardless of changing the default to "always simple", it is already
 good that  `add_edge` will become consistent with the constructor.

 > I do have one question that probably has an answer of "yes"; are there
 still enough examples of graphs not in the extremely cryptic/hermetic
 dictionary of dictionary notation?  I noticed you changed quite a few of
 the dict of lists ones, and I had never seen that other constructor
 before.

 I changed dicts to lists ? Can you tell me where ?

 The dictionary notation is only cryptic when you want "edge-labelled
 multigraphs". When you want simple graphs, it is rather simple: associate
 to each vertex the list of its neighbors.

 To answer your question a bit more completely: I hope that Sage (the code,
 not the doctests) contains no occurrence of `Graph(list_of_edges)`, for
 this is slower than `g=Graph();g.add_edges(list_of_edges)`. This is also
 the point of this ticket: making both equally fast.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15706#comment:43>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to