#16706: Update IML to 1.0.4
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jpflori            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  closed
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  packages:          |   Resolution:  fixed
  standard                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:  iml spkg           |    Reviewers:  François Bissey,
        Authors:  Jean-Pierre Flori  |  Jeroen Demeyer
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  d6d509c03b39cb34e07ef449c2329da78d0f3a1f|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):

 * commit:  d6d509c03b39cb34e07ef449c2329da78d0f3a1f =>


Comment:

 On an old Mac (slightly newer than my usual test machine, but still OS X
 10.4 PPC) iml bails out with complaining about not having ATLAS 3.0 or
 greater.  These built Sage 6.4.beta6 fine (other than rpy2) so it must be
 something about this upgrade that changes it - I assume iml always asked
 for that, see for instance [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-
 forum/sHwJyMp7Wmo this nearly 8-year-old discussion]!

 Could it possibly be the removal of
 {{{
 --with-atlas-include="`pwd`" --with-atlas-lib=/usr/lib
 }}}
 Reading http://web.mit.edu/sage/export/iml-1.0.2/config/atlas-check.m4
 certainly seems to indicate so.

 Even though in general we will have to drop easy support for that old of a
 machine because gcc 4.0.1 won't compile gcc 4.9.x (you'd think it would
 have made sense for gcc to number it 5.0 when they changed the language
 they wrote it in!), I do want to make one final binary for Sage 6.4.1 at
 least, so I would appreciate any assistance.  We don't need a new ticket,
 I don't think.   I'll continue the conversation on
 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-release/xgmJ3nAcUOY

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16706#comment:73>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to