#17516: Radical expressions for roots of polynomials using Galois theory
-------------------------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  gagern                   |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement              |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major                    |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
      Component:  number fields            |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  radical galois symbolic  |    Merged in:
        Authors:                           |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                      |  Work issues:
         Branch:                           |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #14239                   |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:3 gagern]:
 > Computing the Galois group for a polynomial works pretty fast, but I'm
 not sure how much use that really is. I fear we might need the map between
 the original polynomial and the Galois closure. Converting the Galois
 closure for the example above takes some time, but not so much as
 converting that closure to pari. The time is apparently spent somewhere
 inside `_pari_integral_basis`. Now I wonder, do we actually have to call
 `galoisinit` on the galois closure as a number field? Or could we do that
 call on its defining polynomial instead? Something along these lines:
 >
 > {{{
 > sage: Qx.<x> = QQ[]
 > sage: p = x^6-300*x^5+30361*x^4-1061610*x^3+1141893*x^2-915320*x+101724
 > sage: K = NumberField(p, names="a")
 > sage: GC, GCm = K.galois_closure(names="b", map=True)
 > sage: q = GC.defining_polynomial()
 > sage: gal = pari(q).galoisinit()
 > }}}
 Yes indeed

 > {{{
 > sage: G = PermutationGroup(sorted(gal[6], cmp=cmp))
 > sage: G.is_solvable()
 > True
 > sage: ds = G.derived_series()
 > }}}
 I don't think need you need to convert the group to Sage, I would use
 `galoisfixfield()` from PARI. The tricky part will be adding the roots of
 unity, you need to add them manually.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17516#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to