#2907: polynomials lack content method
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: burcin | Owner: somebody
Type: | Status: needs_review
enhancement | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Priority: major | Resolution:
Component: basic | Merged in:
arithmetic | Reviewers:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Authors: | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
Dependencies: |
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by bruno):
* status: new => needs_review
* upstream: => N/A
* milestone: sage-6.4 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Comment:
That is not true anymore!
{{{
#!python
sage: R.<x> = ZZ[]
sage: p = R.random_element(10)
sage: p.content()
1
sage: p *= 13
sage: p.content()
13
}}}
(There is a consistency problem though between different implementations
of `content()` but this ticket can be closed now I think.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/2907#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.