#2907: polynomials lack content method
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  burcin    |        Owner:  somebody
           Type:            |       Status:  needs_review
  enhancement               |    Milestone:  sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
       Priority:  major     |   Resolution:
      Component:  basic     |    Merged in:
  arithmetic                |    Reviewers:
       Keywords:            |  Work issues:
        Authors:            |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A       |     Stopgaps:
         Branch:            |
   Dependencies:            |
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by bruno):

 * status:  new => needs_review
 * upstream:   => N/A
 * milestone:  sage-6.4 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix


Comment:

 That is not true anymore!

 {{{
 #!python
 sage: R.<x> = ZZ[]
 sage: p = R.random_element(10)
 sage: p.content()
 1
 sage: p *= 13
 sage: p.content()
 13
 }}}

 (There is a consistency problem though between different implementations
 of `content()` but this ticket can be closed now I think.)

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/2907#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to