#17240: some rationals not in RIF (docu)
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: rationals, real | Merged in:
interval field, inclusion | Reviewers: Thierry Monteil
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 661629205290eefce73d399f068026042d18f238
u/tmonteil/doc_rationals_in_rif | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
I was about to give this positive review when I realized that this is
almost certainly not going to appear in the ''visible'' documentation. Is
there somewhere in the RIF documentation (maybe the top of the module?)
that this really good documentation can appear to people who are likely to
need it (as opposed to those reading the `__contains__` source, who
probably know what `ulp`s are)? Otherwise this is great.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17240#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
