#17548: Partitions() involving min_slope argument is buggy
---------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: ferriszorro | Owner: ferriszorro
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: Partitions | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+---------------------------
Changes (by tmonteil):
* status: positive_review => needs_work
* milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix => sage-6.5
* component: number theory => combinatorics
Old description:
> sage: Partitions(5,min_slope=1).list()
> [[5], [2, 4]]
New description:
The following bug was reported by an humanoid:
{{{
sage: Partitions(5, min_slope=1).list()
ValueError: [2, 4] is not a valid partition
}}}
Even worse (since silent):
{{{
sage: Partitions(5, min_slope=2).list()
[[5]]
}}}
Or
--
Comment:
I was very puzzled when i saw this ticket, since my Turing tests were not
able to conclude (unless we just reached the singularity). I propose to
reopen the ticket since the report is correct.
By the way, i am not sure the following is a correct behaviour:
{{{
sage: P = Partitions(5, min_slope=2)
sage: Q = Partitions(5)
sage: Q[0]
[5]
sage: Q[0] in P
False
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17548#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.