#17464: Computing the automorphism group of a graph
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: azi | Owner:
Type: | Status: needs_info
enhancement | Milestone: sage-6.5
Priority: major | Resolution:
Component: graph | Merged in:
theory | Reviewers:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Authors: | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | f8dcb7e4ffca76715b478ada498be1714e0f38f1
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/azi/bliss |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by azi):
Replying to [comment:6 ncohen]:
> Yo !
>
> > Continuing our talk here I have a short question. The class
definitions of a Graph and Digraph in bliss both contain the same
functions add_edge(int i, int j) and change_color(int x, int c).
> >
> > Now as far as I see *if* we patch bliss to make these two functions a
(virtual) part of the abstract graph class then we could do something like
>
> Oh. Well... It would be best to not patch anything in bliss, just in
case they release a new version... You can add whatever code you need in
the Sage code though.
>
> But really if it is just to avoid some "if", perhaps that's going a bit
far `O_o`
Yes I am most likely over-thinking it. Though with the if part we get an
awful lot of duplicated (ugly). I guess there is some other way to make it
nice while still being efficient - more to this when the actual branch is
ready for review.
Best,
Jernej
>
> Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17464#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
