#17553: substitute_function() can leave limits unevaluated
-----------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: wonder | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by wonder):
Yes, thank you. I was just converging on the same conclusions about
`'limit` and using a python function to force re-evaluation.
I've been assuming that when I see "limit( ..., x, 0.1 )" in a result,
it's going to be passed back to maxima in a form that'll re-evaluate the
limit. I'd vote for implementing it that way rather than requiring the
user to do "simplify_limit" manually at the appropriate times. But I'm
sure other users are doing infinite sums and such things that are better
not to re-evaluate...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17553#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
