#9248: docstring for factorial doesn't say that it accepts non-integer, non-
symbolic input
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: ddrake | Owner: ddrake
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: | Resolution:
documentation | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> The same person should not both set it to wontfix and give it a positive
review as it skips the review process.
But the invalid and duplicate I think this is okay for. I often give a
positive review to dups or obviously now-functioning tickets.
> And essentially nobody reviews sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix tickets.
Yeah, probably also true.
I do have to say that perhaps we should have a separate wontfix that would
require ''two'' reviewers, maybe? I have occasionally set some notebook
tickets to wontfix but that is a fairly unusual situation.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9248#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
