#6319: [with patch, needs work] optional doctest failure -- mistake in
constructions guide wrt maxima interface
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.1.1
Component: optional packages | Keywords:
Reviewer: Adam Webb | Author:
Merged: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by awebb):
* reviewer: => Adam Webb
Comment:
I still get an error with sage -t -long --optional
devel/sage/doc/en/constructions/plotting.rst, although it is with a return
value of '0' instead of '1'. It passes sage -tp 1
SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/en/constructions/ for me as well.
The odd thing is that if I try the test from the sage command line I don't
get the string returned i.e. the test passes. Or is it fine if 'sage -t'
fails but the documentation is correct for what happens when you actually
run it?
Adam
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6319#comment:2>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
