#6334: [with patch, needs work] optional doctest failure -- broken finance
doctest
failures
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: cswiercz
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.1.1
Component: optional packages | Keywords: finance, stock
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment(by rbeezer):
1. I still get 12 optional doctest failures, it looks like the requested
dates are not being honored, but I haven't deduced a pattern to it. Full
output in attached text file.
2. Documentation can be built with a lot fewer blank lines, especially
inbetween list elements. Reviewer patch illustrates this and corrects one
misspelled word.
3. I couldn't test the documentation since it doesn't seem to get pulled
into the reference manual. Should it be included? If not, how should it
be tested?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6334#comment:3>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
