#9825: desolve_system unable to interpret ilt and Maxima's temporary variables
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: rhinton | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: calculus, maxima, symbolics | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: Fixed upstream, in a later | Work issues:
stable release. | Commit:
Branch: | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by nbruin):
Replying to [comment:15 rws]:
> This now returns `[x1(t) == ilt(-(3*g3390*laplace(x2(t)^2, t, g3390) -
g3390*x1(0) - 3)/g3390^2, g3390, t), x2(t) == t + x2(0)]` so it becomes an
issue to fix our Maxima interface.
According to the documentation of `inverse_laplace` this is probably more
or less correct. We might want to do something about "ilt" so that it is
more closely tied to `inverse_laplace`, though.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9825#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
