#17694: zero vs zero_element / one vs one_element
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vdelecroix/17694 | c0a0bbbe64c8524c98c88f342c62cc426c604260
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Hello,
There are some `zero_element` that you rename to `zero` without adding a
deprecated copy. I wondered if perhaps the deprecated copy was inherited,
but found something weird:
{{{
sage: L = LazyPowerSeriesRing(QQ)
sage: L.zero # zero_element appears when you press tab
L.zero L.zero_element L.zero_ideal
sage: L.zero_element()
...
AttributeError: 'LazyPowerSeriesRing' object has no attribute
'zero_element'
}}}
So it seems that this function, for instance, has no deprecated
`zero_element`. And also that the function still appears in the tab
expansion, which I cannot explain.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17694#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
