#13221: Limit should not depend on dummy variable.
----------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-pending
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------+----------------------------
Comment (by novoselt):
And why should it be `(x,y)` instead of `(y,x)`? What if one depends on
`(a, b)` and the other on `(alpha, beta)`, what should the result be? I
think that in such cases the result should be a symbolic expression (which
is unambiguous), but without any default order of variables. This is why
polynomials in different variables cannot be added - ordering is non-
canonical.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13221#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
