#17326: Implementing subschemes functionality for projective "is_morphism"
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdefaria | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
geometry | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Ben Hutz
Authors: Joao Alberto de | Work issues:
Faria | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 4adf3c9212ddeb60dc7649df33893bcb97bd95a6
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/jdefaria/ticket/17326 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by bhutz):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Sorry to be picky, but I'd like a subscheme example that fails to be a
morphism on projective space, but which is a morphism for a subscheme,
ie., the indeterminancy locus does not intersect the subscheme. The
example you give is already a morphism on projective space.
Otherwise, this looks fine.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17326#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
