#17718: Further clean-up of expect.py
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: interfaces | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix,
Report Upstream: N/A | Marc Mezzarobba
Branch: | Work issues:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/17718 | Commit:
Dependencies: #17704 | d556229dd9fec47e492a3543b0815ce02b4870de
| Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by mmezzarobba):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Vincent Delecroix, Marc Mezzarobba
Comment:
Replying to [comment:8 jdemeyer]:
> I'm not aware of any general rule that tests should pass when run with
`./sage -t --optional=octave`.
What is the point of having an option `--optional=octave` that does not
imply `--optional=sage`, then?
> I prefer to have as few tests as possible optional.
I agree in principle, but here I don't think the example without its
`optional` part is a meaningful test case.
Anyway, I'm fine with leaving that change out if you prefer.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17718#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
