#17754: stopgap enhancement
---------------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  jakobkroeker   |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement    |       Status:  new
       Priority:  minor          |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
      Component:  PLEASE CHANGE  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                 |    Merged in:
        Authors:                 |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A            |  Work issues:
         Branch:                 |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                 |     Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by was):

 Replying to [comment:2 jakobkroeker]:
 > Gee, calm down ;-). This is a half-baked enhancement suggestion, not
 criticism.
 > .

 Sorry -- I worry a huge amount about how to effectively decide to spend
 time.  Mistakenly spending time on things that aren't big problems is a
 huge danger, so I'm particularly careful about it.

 I'm worried not due to criticism but because this suggestion is dangerous
 as is... as Jereon says.

 > > add hide_stopgap('some-hash-of-message')
 >
 > That would be fine right now. At a later time point when the stopgap
 list will be huge
 > (no worries, I will work on that soon *g ) that might be no longer
 sufficient.
 > .
 >
 > >In practice I have never once heard of any complaints from anybody
 about not being able to turn off a stopgap message. Never -- not once.
 >
 > People usually do not complain, they work around issues. We have to
 acitvely ask for reports
 > (as I had e.g. to for [http://www.singular.uni-
 kl.de:8002/trac/ticket/694 Singular bug 694] by Dino Lorenzini; or for
 #17697 - my office colleague dit hit it,...)
 > .

 People complain a lot to me...

 > Absolutely, that makes sense... for most of us. Why not add some
 tolerance for users/developers with a different point of view?

 I agree; that's why I also included some ideas for how to do this.

 I think my suggested approach addresses jdmeyer's very valid concerns
 (which I also have).   Instead of showing the message once, make the user
 have to very explicitly turn off the warning.

 That said, I don't think this should be a high priority.

  -- William

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17754#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to