#17770: Euler numbers revamp
-------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:2 rws]:
> It's not substantially more than any other symbolic function ticket. Not
that there is heavy use that would justify several tickets.
Neither of this matters. The question is: can the issue be easily and
naturally be split up? If the answer to that is yes, it should be done.
I have just seen too often that a ticket does A, B, C and there are issues
with C. These issues with C turn out to be much harder than originally
thought. Therefore, A and B are never merged or merged with a big delay,
even though they could have been merged quickly.
Note: personally I don't care much about this ticket, so if a reviewer
doesn't mind, then it's obviously not a problem.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17770#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
