#17830: Comparison of number field elements dependent of embedding
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vdelecroix/17830 | 5f7f57b445adebb118d1d80acb4e930911265494
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):
* commit: => 5f7f57b445adebb118d1d80acb4e930911265494
* branch: => u/vdelecroix/17830
Comment:
Working implementation (i.e. all tests pass in
`sage.rings.number_fields`). Needs some speedup and bullet proofs!
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=1fd916f2b9b366251867f5a6b4f1dc0d967c99c0
1fd916f]||{{{trac #17830: ordering for real embedded number fields}}}||
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=316dd8ee8d725c784bd76f1d6a978b2847ed168b
316dd8e]||{{{trac #17830: floor/ceil}}}||
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=5f7f57b445adebb118d1d80acb4e930911265494
5f7f57b]||{{{trac #17830: cleaner import in number_field.py}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17830#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
