#17309: SubHypergraphSearch
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Dima Pasechnik
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/17309 | d83413ad45c40ed1b474f521a2bd0164f6c99bbf
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by dimpase):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Dima Pasechnik
Comment:
Replying to [comment:15 ncohen]:
> > The stuff should be tested on a 32-bit system, just to make sure there
is no arch-specific bugs...
>
> Well, you can if you have one but I tried to be careful with respect to
that and explicitly wrote `uint64_t` when I needed a 64-bits integer.
Usually the 'int' variables that I use represent the vertex of a
hypergraph, so I do not think that it will overflow anytime soon `:-P`
OK, it works both on 64 and 32 bit (arando is still alive).
LGTM.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17309#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
