#17903: Wrong approximation for taylor series of L-series for elliptic curves 
on 32
bits architecture.
-----------------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  tmonteil         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect           |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major            |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  elliptic curves  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                   |    Merged in:
        Authors:                   |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A              |  Work issues:
         Branch:                   |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                   |     Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------+------------------------
Description changed by tmonteil:

Old description:

> On 32-bits systems, #16997 introduces the following behaviour:
>
> {{{
> sage: L = EllipticCurve('37a').lseries()
> sage: L.taylor_series(10)
> 0.990010459847588 + 0.0191338632530789*z - 0.0197489006172923*z^2 +
> 0.0137240085327618*z^3 - 0.00703880791607153*z^4 +
> 0.00280906165766519*z^5 + O(z^6)
> }}}
>
> Which is very far from the value before #16997 (which stay unchanged on
> 64 bits architecture).
>
> Note the following gap when increasing the precision by 1 bit:
>
> {{{
> sage: L.taylor_series(10, prec=53)
> 0.990010459847588 + 0.0191338632530789*z - 0.0197489006172923*z^2 +
> 0.0137240085327618*z^3 - 0.00703880791607153*z^4 +
> 0.00280906165766519*z^5 + O(z^6)
>
> sage: L.taylor_series(10, prec=54)
> 0.997997869801216 + 0.00140712894524909*z - 0.000498127610959923*z^2 +
> 0.000118835596665833*z^3 - 0.0000215906522442074*z^4 +
> (3.20363155415891e-6)*z^5 + O(z^6)
> }}}
>
> Direct evaluation leads to the same problem:
>
> {{{
> sage: L.dokchitser(prec=53)(10)
> 0.990010459847588
> sage: L.dokchitser(prec=54)(10)
> 0.997997869801216
> }}}

New description:

 On 32-bits systems, #16997 introduces the following behaviour:

 {{{
 sage: L = EllipticCurve('37a').lseries()
 sage: L.taylor_series(10)
 0.990010459847588 + 0.0191338632530789*z - 0.0197489006172923*z^2 +
 0.0137240085327618*z^3 - 0.00703880791607153*z^4 + 0.00280906165766519*z^5
 + O(z^6)
 }}}

 Which is very far from the value before #16997 (which stay unchanged on 64
 bits architecture).

 Note the following gap when increasing the precision by 1 bit (at 54 bits,
 the value coincides with the one before #16997):

 {{{
 sage: L.taylor_series(10, prec=53)
 0.990010459847588 + 0.0191338632530789*z - 0.0197489006172923*z^2 +
 0.0137240085327618*z^3 - 0.00703880791607153*z^4 + 0.00280906165766519*z^5
 + O(z^6)

 sage: L.taylor_series(10, prec=54)
 0.997997869801216 + 0.00140712894524909*z - 0.000498127610959923*z^2 +
 0.000118835596665833*z^3 - 0.0000215906522442074*z^4 +
 (3.20363155415891e-6)*z^5 + O(z^6)
 }}}

 Direct evaluation leads to the same problem:

 {{{
 sage: L.dokchitser(prec=53)(10)
 0.990010459847588
 sage: L.dokchitser(prec=54)(10)
 0.997997869801216
 }}}

--

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17903#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to