#4781: [duplicate, positive review] creation of relative number fields when
defining polynomial not integral no longer broken
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  was            |       Owner:  davidloeffler
     Type:  defect         |      Status:  new          
 Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  sage-4.1.1   
Component:  number fields  |    Keywords:               
 Reviewer:                 |      Author:               
   Merged:                 |  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

Comment(by davidloeffler):

 In the above example, you can create the field L but you can't do much
 with it (for instance, {{{L.absolute_discriminant()}}} fails). But I would
 argue that this is covered by ticket #252. I propose closing this ticket
 as "duplicate".

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4781#comment:3>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to