#13055: Document default precision for .n() method
--------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: dsm | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: numerical_approx, sd40.5 | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:14 kcrisman]:
> Okay, I don't have that much invested in this. But then {{{x.n?}}}
> should really be improved, and possibly the documentation for other
versions of `.numerical_approx` as well. Those are practically stubs!
This is actually a general problem we have with Sage documentation: often
one has similar functions/methods which all do the same thing (on
different kinds of objects). In this case, the `numerical_approx` function
in `src/sage/misc/functional.py` is much better documented. What's the
optimal solution which doesn't simply replicate the documentation from
`numerical_approx()`?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13055#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
