#11941: Solve and assumptions too aggressive with cube root of negative numbers
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status:
Priority: major | needs_work
Component: symbolics | Milestone: sage-6.4
Keywords: | Resolution:
Authors: | Merged in:
Report Upstream: Not yet reported upstream; | Reviewers:
Will do shortly. | Work issues: report
Branch: | upstream
Dependencies: | Commit:
| Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by rws):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* work_issues: => report upstream
* upstream: N/A => Not yet reported upstream; Will do shortly.
Comment:
As Karl-Dieter says in comment:8 it is not desirable to switch back and
forth with Maxima domain commands, so I don't think your patch is the
right way to solve it, esp. since you don't get the right result, either.
Presumably the failure of assumption should be reported upstream.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11941#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
