#16607: Enforce keyword-only parameters
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: gagern | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Martin von Gagern | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/gagern/ticket/16607 | 60811212e129fa377f1fe34b678b559a771bfbb4
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by gagern):
Replying to [comment:10 jdemeyer]:
> I feel like the issue in the ticket is not serious enough to require
such a heavy-handed solution.
In comment:16:ticket:17234 you yourself had to remind people to not break
positional parameter compatibility. So this looks like a recurring theme.
And just because we have this tool here doesn't mean anyone will be forced
to use it. But people may use it instead of inventing new workarounds at
every turn.
> Note that Cython files do actually support the PEP 3102 syntax even for
Python 2.
That is good to know, thanks!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16607#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
