#18026: Parent breakage because not every SageObject is idempotent
----------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: pickling | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
Replying to [comment:3 vdelecroix]:
> And I would not call it a "parent class" since it is the class of the
object itself that is considered as a parent. Which makes sense.
No. Parent calls are idempontent, type calls are not.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18026#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.